ISSN 2074-9414 (Print),
ISSN 2313-1748 (Online)

Assessment-Based Optimization of Distillation Parameters

Abstract
The range of high-quality alcoholic beverages could be expanded by unconventional raw materials, e.g., bakery waste. Any new technology requires optimization of operating parameters at each production stage. The sensory properties of an alcoholic drink depend on the distillation mode. However, food science knows no objective methods for optimizing distillation parameters based on the biochemical composition of the raw material. The research objective was to develop a new methodology for optimizing the distillation procedure for alcoholic drinks based on unconventional raw materials.
The research featured distillates obtained from industrial samples of bakery waste. The variable factors included the distillation rate, which ranged from 5 to 17 cm3/min, and the wort acidification degree, which was pH 6.0–2.0. The composition and mass concentration of the main volatile components were determined by gas chromatography using a Thermo Trace GC Ultra device (Thermo, USA) with a flame ionization detector. The sensory evaluation was performed by a panel of qualified experts. The single-factor experiment showed that the distillation rate and the wort acidification degree affected the concentration of each volatile component in the distillate.
Using the method of pairwise correlation coefficients, the authors identified the most significant parameters: mass concentration of 1-propanol, phenylethyl alcohol, ethyl lactate, total enanthic esters, total enanthic esters vs. total esters, concentration of ethyl lactate vs. total enanthic esters, isobutanol concentration vs.1-propanol concentration. The linear pair correlation coefficients were calculated for these selected indicators, and the effect of each parameter on the sensory profile was represented as a regression model. The optimal operating parameters were determined by extremization of a two-variable function: pH 4.4 ± 0.2, speed 9.5 ± 1.0 cm3/min.
The new methodology provided for the following sequence of operations: determining the significance of the variable factor; selecting the evaluation parameters based on a single-factor experiment; determining the interaction; developing a regression model. This method can be used to calculate the optimal technological distillation parameters for other raw materials.
Keywords
Alcoholic beverages, distillates, distillation modes, distillation rate, degree of acidification, assessing distillate quality
Contribution
All the authors contributed equally to the study and bear equal responsibility for information published in this article.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this article.
FUNDING
The article was published as part of state assignment No. 0585-2019-001 to the V.M. Gorbatov Federal Research Center for Food Systems of RAS.
REFERENCES
  1. Piggott JR, Conner JM. Whiskies. In: Lea AGH, Piggott JR, editors. Fermented beverage production. New York: Springer; 2003. pp. 239–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0187-9_11
  2. Heller D, Eimfalt D. Reproducibility of fruit spirit distillation processes. Beverages. 2022;8(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages8020020
  3. Darıcı M, Bergama D, Cabaroglu T. Effect of triple pot still distillation on the volatile compositions during the Rakı production. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation. 2019;43(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.13864
  4. Korzenszky P, Barátossy G, Székely L, Géczi G. A case study comparing distillation technologies for plum palinka production. Potravinarstvo Slovak Journal of Food Sciences. 2020;14:1191–1199. https://doi.org/10.5219/1472
  5. Spaho N. Distillation techniques in the fruit spirits production. In: Mendes M, editor. Distillation – Innovative applications and modeling. IntechOpen; 2017. https://doi.org/10.5772/66774
  6. Szambelan K, Nowak J, Szwengiel A, Jeleń H. Comparison of sorghum and maize raw distillates: Factors affecting ethanol efficiency and volatile by-product profile. Journal of Cereal Science. 2020;91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2019.102863
  7. Heller D, Roj S, Switulla J, Kolling R, Einfalt D. Tackling foam-based process disruptions in spirit distillation by thermal energy input adaptations. Food and Bioprocess Technology. 2022;15(3):821–832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-022-02785-5
  8. Douady A, Puentes C, Awad P, Esteban-Decloux M. Batch distillation of spirits: experimental study and simulation of the behaviour of volatile aroma compounds. Journal of the Institute of Brewing. 2019;125(2):268–283. https://doi.org/10.1002/jib.560
  9. Krikunova LN, Meleshkina EP, Vitol IS, Dubinina EV, Obodeeva ON. Grain bran hydrolysates in the production of fruit distillates. Foods and Raw Materials. 2023;11(1):35–42. https://doi.org/10.21603/2308-4057-2023-1-550
  10. Xiang X-F, Lan Y-B, Gao X-T, Xie H, An Z-Y, Lv Z-H, et al. Characterization of odor-active compounds in the head, heart, and tail fractions of freshly distilled spirit from Spine grape (Vitis davidii Foex) wine by gas chromatography-olfactometry and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Food Research International. 2020;137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109388
  11. Tian T-T, Ruan S-L, Zhao Y-P, Li J-M, Yang C, Cao H. Multi-objective evaluation of freshly distilled brandy: Characterisation and distribution patterns of key odour-active compounds. Food Chemistry: X. 2022;14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fochx.2022.100276
  12. Esteban-Decloux M, Dechatre J-C, Legendre P, Guichard H. Double batch cider distillation: Influence of the recycling of the separated fractions. LWT. 2021;146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111420
  13. Oganesyants LA, Panasyuk AL, Reytbalt BB. Theory and practice of fruit winemaking. Moscow: Razvitie; 2012. 393 p. (In Russ.).
  14. García-Llobodanin L, Senn T, Ferrando M, Güell C, López F. Influence of the fermentation pH on the final quality of Blanquilla pear spirits. International Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2010;45(4):839–848. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2010.02206.x
  15. Oganesyants LA, Peschanskaja VA, Obodeeva ON. Influence of acidification on content of volatile components in fermented wort of Jerusalem artichoke. Beer and Beverages. 2018;(1):36–38. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/YREZQT
  16. Panfilov VA. Synergetic approach to agro-industrial technologies of the future. Food Processing: Techniques and Technology. 2020;50(4):642–649. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21603/2074-9414-2020-4-642-649
  17. Kurakin MS, Ozherel’eva AV, Motyreva OG, Krapiva TV. A new approach to the development of food products. Food Processing: Techniques and Technology. 2021;51(3):434–448. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21603/2074-9414-2021-3-434-448
  18. The hard bread [Internet]. [cited 2022 Sep 15]. Available from: https://plus.rbc.ru/news/5b0309107a8aa9185dd2e978
  19. Didikov AE. Order and features of the organization of industrial environmental monitoring at the enterprises of the baking industry. Scientific Journal of NIU ITMO. Series Economics and Environmental Management. 2020;(1):95–102. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17586/2310-1172-2020-13-1-95-102
  20. Making a crust: Tesco to use unsold bread in new products. [Internet]. [cited 2022 Sep 15]. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/jul/06/making-a-crust-tesco-to-use-unsold-bread-in-new-products
  21. Martirosyan VV, Volokhova LT, Stepanyuk VD, Volokhova MN. Analysis of the actual state of bakery production wastes and definition of criteria for classifying waste as a hazard class for the environment. Baking in Russia. 2018;(2):10–14. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/XYJYXR
  22. Volokhova LT, Stepanyuk VD, Volokhova MN. Development of a technique of production environmental control of the address with waste at the baking and macaroni enterprises. Bread Products. 2018;(7):50–53. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/XSVXJJ
  23. Krikunova LN, Peschanskaya VA, Zakharov MA. Mineral composition of returnable waste bakery products. Technology and Merchandising of the Innovative Foodstuff. 2018;49(2):25–29. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/XPUKVN
  24. Krikunova LN, Dubinina EV. Study of protein complex of return waste of the bread-baking production. Technology and Merchandising of the Innovative Foodstuff. 2018;53(6):63–66. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/YOGISD
  25. Krikunova LN, Peschanskaya VA, Zakharov MA. Researching the process of obtaining the wort from returnable waste of bread production. Beer and Beverages. 2018;(3):20–23. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/YKWCXR
  26. Brochet F, Dobourdieu D. Wine descriptive language supports cognitive specificity of chemical senses. Brain and Language. 2001;77(2):187–196. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2000.2428
How to quote?
Krikunova LN, Dubinina EV, Sviridov DA, Tomgorova SM. Assessment-Based Optimization of Distillation Parameters. Food Processing: Techniques and Technology. 2023;53(2):326–334. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21603/20749414-2023-2-2437 
About journal