Abstract

Traditional energy sources pollute the environment. Microbial fuel cells are an alternative energy source that can reduce the environmental burden. Microbial fuel cells also remove recalcitrant wastes from wastewater. This research featured the enzymatic potential of microbial isolates obtained from the Abakan Arzhan thermal spring.
The study involved isolates of the genera Geobacter, Thermomonas, and Rhodopseudomonas. The keratinolytic analysis was in line with State Standard R 55987-2014. The chitinolytic activity was determined by injecting a bacterial suspension on Petri dishes with a chitin-containing medium. The lipolytic analysis involved cultivating the isolates in Stern’s glycerol fuchsin broth. The xylan hydrolysis depended on the reducing sugars. The cellulase activity was measured according to the standard method recommended by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC). The catalase potential was evaluated by the gasometric method on 1% gasoline media. The optimal parameters of consortium cultivation were determined by the voltage generated.
The Geobacter isolate had the maximal keratinolytic activity while the Thermomonas isolate demonstrated the maximal protein hydrolysis (80.1 ± 1.5%). Both Geobacter and Rhodopseudomonas showed good lytic activity against chitin with the lysis zone of ≥ 3 mm. The Geobacter isolate demonstrated as many as 350 units of xylanase activity and 365 units of cellulase activity; Thermomonas had 350 units of xylanase activity and 360 units of cellulase activity; Rhodopseudomonas showed 310 units of xylanase activity and 304 units of cellulase activity. The maximal catalase properties belonged to Geobacter (1.40 units) and Thermomonas (1.38 units). The maximal energy generation by bacterial consortia occurred at pH 8 and 45°C after 48 h of cultivation.
In this research, isolates of the genera Geobacter, Thermomonas, and Rhodopseudomonas from the Abakan Arzhan thermal spring were able to remove recalcitrant components, thus demonstrating good prospects for biological treatment of industrial wastewater.

Keywords

Environmentally friendly energy, extremophilic microorganisms, enzymatic activity, microbial fuel cell, hard-to-decompose substrates

FUNDING

The research was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (Minobrnauka) as part of the Grant of the President of the Russian Federation for young scientists and postgraduate students working in priority areas of modernization of the Russian economy (SP 2021–2023), project topic: Energy-efficient environmentally friendly technology for generating electricity from thermal spring bioma ss.

REFERENCES

1. Owusu PA, Asumadu-Sarkodie S. A review of renewable energy sources, sustainability issues and climate change mitigation. Cogent Engineering. 2016;3. https://doi.org/10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.3381454
2. Halkos GE, Gkampoura E-C. Reviewing usage, potentials, and limitations of renewable energy sources. Energies. 2020;13(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/en13112906
3. Elhenawy S, Khraisheh M, AlMomani F, Al-Ghouti M, Hassan MK. From waste to watts: Updates on key applications of microbial fuel cells in wastewater treatment and energy production. Sustainability. 2022;14(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020955
4. Kurniawan TA, Othman MHD, Singh D, Avtar R, Goh HH, Setiadi T, et al. Technological solutions for long-term management of partially used nuclear fuel: A critical review. Annals of Nuclear Energy. 2022;166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2021.108736
5. Ivanova S, Vesnina A, Fotina N, Prosekov A. An overview of carbon footprint of coal mining to curtail greenhouse gas emissions. Sustainability. 2022;14(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215135
6. Levitan O, Dinamarca J, Hochman G, Falkowski PG. Diatoms: A fossil fuel of the future. Trends in Biotechnology. 2014;32(3):117–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2014.01.004
7. Guo Y, Wang J, Shinde S, Wang X, Li Y, Dai Y, et al. Simultaneous wastewater treatment and energy harvesting in microbial fuel cells: An update on the biocatalysts. RSC Advances. 2020;10:25874–25887. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RA05234E
8. Din MI, Nabi AG, Hussain Z, Khalid R, Iqbal M, Arshad M, et al. Microbial fuel cells – A preferred technology to prevail energy crisis. International Journal of Energy Research. 2021;45(6):8370–8388. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.6403
9. He L, Du P, Chen Y, Lu H, Cheng X, Chang B, et al. Advances in microbial fuel cells for wastewater treatment. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2017;71:388–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.069
10. Chettri D, Verma AK, Sarkar L, Verma AK. Role of extremophiles and their extremozymes in biorefinery process of lignocellulose degradation. Extremophiles. 2021;25:203–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00792-021-01225-0
11. Faskhutdinova ER, Fotina NV, Neverova OA, Golubtsova YuV, Mudgal G, Asyakina LK, et al. Extremophilic bacteria as biofertilizer for agricultural wheat. Foods and Raw Materials. 2024;12(2):348–360. https://doi.org/10.21603/2308-4057-2024-2-613
12. Gallo G, Puopolo R, Carbonaro M, Maresca E, Fiorentino G. Extremophiles, a nifty tool to face environmental pollution: From exploitation of metabolism to genome engineering. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021;18(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105228
13. Breheny M, Bowman K, Farahmand N, Gomaa O, Keshavarz T, Kyazze G. Biocatalytic electrode improvement strategies in microbial fuel cell systems. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology. 2019;94(7):2081–2091. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.5916
14. Pandit S, Savla N, Sonawane JM, Sani AM, Gupta PK, Mathuriya AS, et al. Agricultural waste and wastewater as feedstock for bioelectricity generation using microbial fuel cells: Recent advances. Fermentation. 2021;7(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation7030169
15. Shestakova A, Timorshina S, Osmolovskiy A. Biodegradation of keratin-rich husbandry waste as a path to sustainable agriculture. Sustainability. 2021;13(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168691
16. Stingone JA, Wing S. Poultry litter incineration as a source of energy: Reviewing the potential impacts on environmental health and justice. New Solutions: A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy. 2011;21(1):27–42. https://doi.org/10.2190/NS.21.1.g
17. Tesfaye T, Sithole B, Ramjugernath D. Valorisation of chicken feathers: a review on recycling and recovery route – current status and future prospects. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy. 2017;19:2363–2378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-017-1443-9
18. Pahua-Ramos ME, Hernández-Melchor DJ, Camacho-Pérez B, Quezada-Cruz M. Degradation of chicken feathers: A review. BioTechnology: An Indian Journal. 2017;13(6):1–24.
19. Gasmi M, Kitouni M, Carro L, Pujic P, Normand P, Boubakri H. Chitinolytic actinobacteria isolated from an Algerian semi-arid soil: Development of an antifungal chitinase-dependent assay and GH18 chitinase gene identification. Annals of Microbiology. 2019;69:395–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-018-1426-z
20. Borić M, Puliyalil H, Novak U, Likozar B. An intensified atmospheric plasma-based process for the isolation of the chitin biopolymer from waste crustacean biomass. Green Chemistry. 2018;20:1199–1204. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7gc03735j
21. Sharma S, Kaur N, Kaur R, Ramande K. A review on valorization of chitinous waste. Journal of Polymer Research. 2021;28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-021-02759-9
22. Lopes M, Miranda SM, Alves JM, Pereira AS, Belo I. Waste cooking oils as feedstock for lipase and lipid‐rich biomass production. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology. 2019;121(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/ejlt.201800188
23. Kumar R, Singh L, Zularisam AW, Hai FI. Microbial fuel cell is emerging as a versatile technology: A review on its possible applications, challenges and strategies to improve the performances. International Journal of Energy Research. 2018;42(2):369–394. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.3780
24. Mukherjee A, Patel R, Zaveri P, Shah MT, Munshi NS. Microbial fuel cell performance for aromatic hydrocarbon bioremediation and common effluent treatment plant wastewater treatment with bioelectricity generation through series‐parallel connection. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 2022;75(4):785–795. https://doi.org/10.1111/lam.13612
25. Dmitrieva AI, Faskhutdinova ER, Drozdova MYu, Kutuzov SS, Proskuryakova LA. Phylogenetic diversity of microorganisms from the Abakan Arzhan thermal spring: Potential producers of microbial energy. Food Processing: Techniques and Technology. 2022;52(3):458–468. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21603/2074-9414-2022-3-2384
26. Muyizer G, de Waal EC, Uitterlinden AG. Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1993;59(3):695–700. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.59.3.695-700.1993
27. Andreeva A, Budenkova E, Babich O, Sukhikh S, Ulrikh E, Ivanova S, et al. Production, purification, and study of the amino acid composition of microalgae proteins. Molecules. 2021;26(9).
28. Prosekov AYu, Babich OO, Bespomestnykh KV. Identification of industrially important lactic acid bacteria in foodstuffs. Foods and Raw Materials. 2013;1(2):42–45. https://doi.org/10.12737/2053
29. Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Research. 2013;41(D1):D590–D596. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1219
30. König J, Grasser R, Pikor H, Vogel K. Determination of xylanase, β-glucanase, and cellulase activity. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2002;374:80–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-002-1379-7
31. Ghose TK. Measurement of cellulase activities. Pure and Applied Chemistry. 1987;59(2):257–268.
32. Galstyan ASh. Unified methods for studying soil enzymes. Eurasian Soil Science. 1978;(2):107–113. (In Russ.).
33. Cavello I, Urbieta MS, Cavalitto S, Donati E. Bacillus cytotoxicus isolated from a pristine natural geothermal area reveals high keratinolytic activity. Microorganisms. 2020;8(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8060796
34. Dhole NP, Dar MA, Pandit RS. Recent advances in the bioprospection and applications of chitinolytic bacteria for valorization of waste chitin. Archives of Microbiology. 2021;203:1953–1969. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-021-02234-5
35. Evvyernie D, Morimoto K, Karita S, Kimura T, Sakka K, Ohmiya K. Conversion of chitinous wastes to hydrogen gas by Clostridium paraputrificum M-21. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering. 2001;91(4):339–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1389-1723(01)80148-1
36. Kolotova OV, Sokolova IV, Vladimtseva IV, Belenʹkova TV, Shevtsova VS. Isolation and study of lipid-oxidizing microorganisms from the northen Caspian Sea. Bulletin of the Technological University. 2017;20(6):135–138. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/YIXKJP