Abstract

As the range of domestic cheeses has increased, Russian cheese industry needs new monospecific starters with multidirectional or targeted actions. Advanced monospecific concentrates with strong proteolytic properties boost proteolysis, reduce ripening time, and improve the sensory profile of the finished product. This article describes some strains of mesophilic lactobacilli with good prospects for commercial cheese production.
The lactobacilli strains were isolated from the collection of microorganisms of the All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Butter and Cheese Production, Uglich, Russia. They included Lactiplantibacillus plantarum 28 and 37, Lacticaseibacillus casei 738-11, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei K-6, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus P, and Limosilactobacillus fermentum 39. The proteolytic profile was estimated by the amount of accumulated non-protein nitrogen and the buffer capacity of the water-soluble fraction. The skim-milk cultivation revealed two optimal strains with the highest proteolytic effect, i.e., L. rhamnosus P and L. paracasei K-6. They served as additional cultures to the main industrial starter.
L. rhamnosus P accumulated biomass faster during processing and pressing; L. paracasei K-6 developed more intensively during ripening. The highest count of viable lactobacilli cells reached 8.55 lg CFU/g in the cheese samples with L. rhamnosus P and 8.94 lg CFU/g in the samples with L. paracasei K-6. L. rhamnosus P died slower and demonstrated a stimulating effect on lactococci. The high content of lactobacilli in the experimental cheeses (≥108 CFU/g) made it possible to classify them as dairy probiotics. The samples with L. paracasei K-6 and L. rhamnosus P proved to be more active proteolytics. By the end of ripening, the experimental samples contained 20% more non-protein nitrogen than the control. The cheeses fortified with L. paracasei K-6 received the highest score for taste and aroma, which correlated with the greatest change in the buffer capacity of the watersoluble fraction.
L. paracasei K-6 and L. rhamnosus P in monospecific starters proved able to improve the quality of cheese and intensify its production.

Keywords

Cheese production, starters, lactobacilli, proteolytic activity, ripening, sensory properties

FUNDING

The research was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation as a major research project in a priority R&D area (grant No. 075-15-2024-483).

REFERENCES

1. Coelho MC, Malcata FX, Silva CCG. Lactic acid bacteria in raw-milk cheeses: From starter cultures to probiotic functions. Foods. 2022;11(15):2276. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11152276
2. Funk IA, Ott EF, Orlova TN, Dorofeev RV, Shevchenko KE. Lactobacilli and their use in biotechnology. Dairy industry. 2020;(6):19-21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31515/1019-8946- 2020-06-19-20
3. Lepilkina OV, Grigorieva AI. Enzymatic proteolysis during the conversion of milk into cheese. Food systems. 2023;6(1):36-45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21323/2618-9771-2023-6-1-36-45
4. Kitaevskaya SV, Ponomarev VY, Reshetnik OA. Evaluation of the proteolytic activity of new cryoresistant lactobacillus strains. Proceedings of Universities. Applied Chemistry and Biotechnology. 2022;12(1):76-86. (In Russ.) https:// doi.org/10.21285/2227-2925-2022-12-1-76-86
5. Alkhateeb KM, Danilchuk TN. Using the proteolytic properties of the biomass of lactic acid microorganisms to create new food products. Health, Food & Biotechnology. 2022;4(4):65-77. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36107/hfb.2022.i4.s160
6. Kieliszek M, Pobiega K, Piwowarek K, Kot AM. Characteristics of the proteolytic enzymes produced by lactic acid bacteria. Molecules. 2021;26(7):1858. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26071858
7. Gänzle MG. Lactic metabolism revisited: Metabolism of lactic acid bacteria in food fermentations and food spoilage. Current Opinion in Food Science. 2015;2:106-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2015.03.001
8. Kurbanova M, Voroshilin R, Kozlova O, Atuchin V. Effect of lactobacteria on bioactive peptides and their sequence identification in mature cheese. Microorganisms. 2022;10(10):2068. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10102068
9. Afshari R, Pillidge CJ, Dias DA, Osborn AM, Gill H. Cheesomics: The future pathway to understanding cheese flavour and quality. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2020;60(1):33-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2018.1512471
10. Choi J, Han HU. Microbial proteases in fermentation. In: Ray RC, Montet D, editors. Fermented foods, part II. Technological interventions. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2015. pp. 103-121.
11. Abarquero D, Duque C, Bodelon R, Lopez I, Munoz J, et al. Autochthonous cultures to improve the quality of PGI Castellano cheese: Impact on proteolysis, microstructure and texture during ripening. Food Research International. 2024;186:114306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2024.114306
12. Choi J, Lee SI, Rackerby B, Frojen R, Goddik L, et al. Assessment of overall microbial community shift during Cheddar cheese production from raw milk to aging. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2020;104(14):6249-6260. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s00253-020-10651-7
13. Wilbey RA. Heat treatment of foods. Principles of pasteurization. In: Encyclopedia of Food Microbiology (Second Edition). London: Academic Press; 2014. pp. 169-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-384730-0.00159-2
14. Zheng J, Wittouck S, Salvetti E, Franz CMAP, Harris HMB, et al. A taxonomic note on the genus Lactobacillus: Description of 23 novel genera, emended description of the genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901, and union of Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2020;70(4):2782-2858. https:// doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.004107
15. Gobbetti M, de Angelis M, di Cagno R, Mancini L, Fox PF. Pros and cons for using non-starter lactic acid bacteria (NSLAB) as secondary/Adjunct starters for cheese ripening. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2015;45(2):167-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2015.07.016
16. de Pasquale I, di Cagno R, Buchin S, de Angeli SM, Gobbetti M. Use of autochthonous mesophilic lactic acid bacteria as starter cultures for making Pecorino Crotonese cheese: Effect on compositional, microbiological and biochemical attributes. Food Research International. 2019;116:1344-1356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.10.024
17. Nicosia FD, Pino A, Maciel GLR, Sanfilippo RR, Caggia C, et al. Technological characterization of lactic acid bacteria strains for potential use in cheese manufacture. Foods. 2023;12(6):1154. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12061154
18. Carafa I, Stocco G, Franceschi P, Summer A, Tuohy KM, et al. Evaluation of autochthonous lactic acid bacteria as starter and non-starter cultures for the production of Traditional Mountain cheese. Food Research International. 2019;115:209-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.08.069
19. Karychev R, Eliseeva T. Bacterial cultures “Crealat” and natural enzymes “Crearen” - Your success in cheese production. Cheese- and buttermaking. 2018;(9):28-29. (In Russ.)
20. Kashina ED. Opportunities for expanding horizons. Cheese- and buttermaking. 2020;(3):33-35. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/UBJJKG
21. Mordvinova VA. Actual questions of assortment policy of a cheese making enterprise. Cheese- and butter-making. 2021;(5):8-9. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31515/2073-4018-2021-5-8-9
22. Araújo-Rodrigues H, dos Santos MTPG, Ruiz-Moyano S, Tavaria FK, Martins APL, et al. Technological and protective performance of LAB isolated from Serpa PDO cheese: Towards selection and development of an autochthonous starter culture. LWT. 2021;150:112079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112079
23. García-Cano I, Rocha-Mendoza D, Ortega-Anaya J, Wang K, Kosmerl E, et al. Lactic acid bacteria isolated from dairy products as potential producers of lipolytic, proteolytic and antibacterial proteins. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2019;103:5243-5257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-019-09844-6
24. Wang Y, Zhang C, Liu F, Jin Z, Xia X. Ecological succession and functional characteristics of lactic acid bacteria in traditional fermented foods. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2023;63(22):5841-5855. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 10408398.2021.2025035
25. Yang S, Bai M, Kwok L-Y, Sun Z. The intricate symbiotic relationship between lactic acid bacterial starters in the milk fermentation ecosystem. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2025;65(4):728-745. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 10408398.2023.2280706
26. Canon F, Nidelet T, Guédon E, Thierry A, Gagnaire V. Understanding the mechanisms of positive microbial interactions that benefit lactic acid bacteria co-cultures. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2020;11:2088. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fmicb.2020.02088
27. Gaudu P, Yamamoto Y, Jensen PR, Hammer K, Lechardeur D, et al. Genetics of Lactococci. ASM Journals. Microbiology Spectrum. 2019;7(4):1-25. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.gpp3-0035-2018
28. Aljewicz M, Cichosz G, Nalepa B, Kowalska M. Influence of the probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM and Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 on proteolysis patterns of Edam cheese. Food Technology and Biotechnology. 2014;52(4): 439-447. https://doi.org/10.17113/ftb.52.04.14.3659
29. Zagaynova AV, Fedets ZE, Pan’kova MN, Novozhilov KA, Gritsyuk OV, et al. Lactobacillies as a component of the intestinal microbiota and their significance in the physiological state of humans. Russian Journal of Environmental and Rehabilitation Medicine. 2022;(4):12-25. (In Russ.)
30. Glück C, Stressler T, Fischer L. Heat-stable microbial peptidases associated with the microbiota of raw milk. In: Kelly AL, Larsen LB, editors. Agents of Change. Enzymes in Milk and Dairy Products. Cham: Springer Cham; 2021. pp. 269-290.