Abstract

Domestic and international experience confirm the expediency of enzymes in meat industry. Enzymes are used for biomodification proposes when it goes about raw materials with the high-content of connective tissue, e.g. chopped semi-finished products, delicatessen, sausages, etc. Ostrich meat is an advantageous source of functional food products due to its high content of native protein, selenium, magnesium, phosphorus, and group B vitamins and low contents of cholesterol. However, a significant amount of connective tissue makes it rigid. Application of collagenase improves the functional and technological properties of minced meat and product yield. The purpose of the present research was to optimize the technological parameters of fermented ostrich minced meat by the method of multifactorial experiment planning. The ostrich thighs parts were produced on the territory of the Leningrad Region. The authors used the fractional factorial experiment to study the influence of three factors on response functions: the mass fraction of collagenase (C, the coded variable X1), the holding time (τ, the coded variable X2), and the holding temperature (t, the coded variable X3). The values of moisture-holding ability (Y1) and the content of amino nitrogen (Y2) were chosen as response functions. The study had the following parameters of fermentation at the main level and the interval of variation: C0 = 0,04%, ΔC = 0,02%; τ0 = 4 hr, Δτ = 2 hr; t0 = 12o C, Δt = 7oC. The experiment resulted in a matrix of experiment planning and several regression equations, which describe the process in question. The study revealed the optimal technological parameters of minced meat fermentation with collagenase: mass fraction of collagenase was 0.05% while the duration of exposure of minced meat was 4.5 hours at t = 13°C. These technological parameters allowed the authors to obtain minced meat with better organoleptic characteristics and functional and technological properties in comparison with those of the control sample. The obtained fermented minced meat and the selected regimes are recommended for chopped semi-finished products, cooked sausages, and meat-vegetable canned foods.

Keywords

Optimization, collagenase, ostrich meat, technological parameters, regression equation

REFERENCES

1. Turchaninov D.V., Wilms E.A., Boyarskaya L.A., and Turchaninova M.S. The Impact Diet and Lifestyle on Public Health: Current Approaches to Assessment and Strategies for Prevention. Food processing industry, 2015, no. 1, pp. 8–11. (In Russ.).
2. Ulumbekova G.E. Population health in the Russian Federation: risk factors and role of healthy nutrition. Problems of Nutrition, 2010, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 33–38. (In Russ.).
3. Kodentsova V.M., Vrzhesinskaya O.A., Risnik D.V., Nikityuk D.B., and Tutelyan V.A. Micronutrient status of population of the Russian Federation and possibility of its correction. State of the problem. Problems of Nutrition, 2017, vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 113–124. (In Russ.).
4. Gerasimenko N.F., Poznyakovskiy V.M., and Chelnokova N.G. Healthy eating and its role in ensuring the quality of life.Technologies of food and processing industry of AIC – healthy food, 2016, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 52–57. (In Russ.).
5. Kuzmichev V.Yu. and Kolodyaznaya V.S. Evaluation of ostrich meat quality. Meat Industry, 2008, no. 11, pp. 20–24. (In Russ.).
6. Sarbatova N.Yu., Ostroukh E.A., Sycheva O.V., Epimakhova E.Eh., and Omarov R.S. Kharakteristika lineyki produktov strausovodstva [Characteristics of the ostrich farming product line]. Pishchevaya industriya [Food industry], 2018, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 55–57. (In Russ.).
7. Horbańczuk O.K. and Wierzbicka A. Technological and nutritional properties of ostrich, emu, and rhea meat quality.Journal of Veterinary Research, 2016, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 279–286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jvetres-2016-0043.
8. Sarbatova N.Yu., Omarov R.S., Izmaylova S.A., and Sychyova O.V. Teoreticheskoe obosnovanie razrabotki spetsializirovannogo myasnogo produkta na osnove myasa strausa [Theoretical justification for the development of a specialized meat product based on ostrich meat]. Meat Technology, 2015, vol. 149, no. 5, pp. 48–51. (In Russ.).
9. Zinina O.V., Rebezov M.B., Miroshnikova E.P., and Prokhasko L.S. Innovations in production of foods of animal origin.Scientific Journal of Kaliningrad State Technical University, 2016, no. 42, pp. 104–116. (In Russ.).
10. Rimareva L.V., Serba E.M., Sokolova E.N., Borshcheva Yu.A., and Ignatova N.I. Enzyme preparations and biocatalytic processes in the food industry. Problems of Nutrition, 2017, vol. 86, no. 5, pp. 63–74. (In Russ.).
11. Kashchenko E.A., Artemov E.S., Kurchaeva E.E., and Manzhesov V.I. Prospects of use of vegetable components and fermental preparations in the tselnokuskov technology of meat products. Tekhnologii i tovarovedenie selʹskokhozyaystvennoy produktsii [Technologies and commodity research of agricultural products], 2015, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 110–114. (In Russ.).
12. Antipova L.V. and Gorbunkov M.V. Protepsin-novyy fermentnyy preparat otechestvennogo proizvodstva dlya obrabotki myasnogo i molochnogo syrʹya [Domestic protepsin-new enzyme preparation for processing meat and dairy raw materials]. Sbornik trudov konferentsii: “Perspektivnye fermentnye preparaty i biotekhnologicheskie protsessy v tekhnologiyakh produktov pitaniya i kormov” [Proceedings of the conference: Advantageous enzyme preparations and biotechnological processes in food and feed technologies]. Moscow, 2016, pp. 7–12. (In Russ.).
13. Mora L., Reig M., Toldrá F. Bioactive peptides generated from meat industry by-products. Food Research International, 2014, vol. 65, pp. 344–349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2014.09.014.
14. Verma S., Biswas S., Rindhe S.N., Kumari B., and Kumbha V.H. Effect of Tenderization on Histological, Physico- Chemical and Properties of Raw and Cooked Emu Meat Treated with Natural Tenderizers. International Journal of Pure & Applied Bioscience, 2018, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 322–332. DOI: http://doi.org/10.18782/2320-7051.5995.
15. Bekhit A.A., Hopkins D.L., Geesink G., Bekhit A.A., and Franks P. Exogenous Proteases for Meat Tenderization. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 2014, vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 1012–1031. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2011.6 23247.
16. Cazarin C.B.B., Lima G.C., da Silva J.K., and Maróstica M.R. Enzymes in meat processing. In: Chandrasekaran M. (ed) Enzymes in food and beverage processing. Boca Raton: CRC Press Publ., 2015. pp. 337–351.
17. Arshad M.S., Kwon J.-H., Imran M., et al. Plant and bacterial proteases: A key towards improving meat tenderization, a mini review. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 2016, vol. 2, no. 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2016.1261780.
18. Pal G.K. and Suresh P.V. Microbial collagenases: challenges and prospects in production and potential applications in food and nutrition. RSC Advances, 2016, vol. 6, no. 40, pp. 33763–33780. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra23316j.
19. Yunusov Eh.Sh., Ponomarev V.Ya., Morozova S.A., and Ezhkova G.O. Izuchenie gidroliza kollagensoderzhashchego syrʹya proteoliticheskimi fermentami [The hydrolysis of collagen-containing raw materials by proteolytic enzymes]. Herald of Kazan Technological University, 2016, vol. 19, no. 24, pp. 168–170. (In Russ.).
20. Chertova A.S. and Ruzaeva D.N. Sposoby fermentirovaniya kollagensoderzhashchego syrʹya [Methods for fermenting collagen-containing raw materials]. Innovation Science, 2017, no. 12, pp. 70–72. (In Russ.).
21. Bazarnova Yu.G., Burova T.E., Marchenko V.I., Smelik V.A., and Tretʹyakov N.A. Biokhimicheskie osnovy pererabotki i khraneniya syrʹya zhivotnogo proiskhozhdeniya [Biochemical foundations for processing and storage of raw materials of animal origin]. St. Petersburg: Prospect Nauki Publ., 2011. 192 p. (In Russ.).
22. Grachev Yu.P. and Plaksin Yu.M. Matematicheskie metody planirovaniya ehksperimenta [Mathematical methods of experiment planning]. Moscow: DeLi print Publ., 2005. 296 p. (In Russ.).