Abstract

Yeast strains used in traditional breadmaking are designed to produce the best substrate fermentation and a high-quality product that meets all the requirements. However, the use of brewing yeast strains makes it possible to increase the biological value of the finished product rich in various vitamins and micro- and macroelements. Thus, the research objective was to investigate the effect of a new yeast strain on the physicochemical and organoleptic quality indicators of test semi-finished products and wheat bread in order to develop a technology for using yeast strain Y 3194 in baking industry. The control and experimental samples were made with the use of sponge, straight, and quick dough methods, as well as the concentrated milk ferment method. The authors studied the baking properties of the brewery yeasts and selected the dosage with the best physico-chemical and organoleptic characteristics of the finished product. By measuring the intensity of gas-producing and gas-retaining power during the dough fermentation, the fermentation in the control sample was found more intense, but there was a slight difference in the gas-retaining ratio (98.4% for the control sample and 99.4% for the experimental sample). The physicochemical parameters of bread made with the help of the new yeast strain and straight and quick dough methods did not exceed the permissible values: the crumb humidity was ≤ 44%; crumb acidity was ≤ 3%; crumb porosity was ≥ 72%. The research proved that yeast strain Y 3194 can be used in baking.

Keywords

Breadmaking, brewery yeasts, dough process, bread physicochemical parameters

REFERENCES

1. Davydenko S.G. and Meledina T.V. Vliyanie shtamma drozhzhey Y-3194 na polnotu vkusa i sladostʹ piva [The effect of yeast strain Y-3194 on the palate fullness and sweetness of beer]. RealBrew, 2014, no. 1, pp. 18–20. (In Russ.).
2. Soboleva E.V., Sergacheva E.S., and Ternovskoy G.V. Use of a probiotic yeast strain in technology of bread from wheat flour. International Academy of Refrigeration, 2016, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 11–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21047/1606-4313-2016-15-4- 11-15.
3. Davydenko S.G., Afonin D.V., Batashov B.E., et al. A new yeast strain for brewery: Properties and advantages. Russian Journal of Genetics, 2010, vol. 46, no. 11, pp. 1473–1484. (In Russ.).
4. Afonin D.V., Batashov B.Eh., Bogdanova E.V., Davydenko S.G., and Dedegkaev A.T. Shtamm drozhzhey Saccharomyces cerevisiae dlya primeneniya v pivovarennoy promyshlennosti [Yeast strain Saccharomyces cerevisiae in brewing industry]. Patent FR, no. 2340666, 2008.
5. «Metodika opredeleniya reofermentometricheskikh kharakteristik testa na pribore RHEO – 3» – ukazaniya k ispolʹzovaniyu pribora; «Metodika opredeleniya deformatsionnykh kharakteristik myakisha na pribore ST-2» – ukazaniya k ispolʹzovaniyu pribora [“Methods for determining the re-enzyme characteristics of dough with the help of RHEO – 3 equipment” - Manual; “Method for determining the deformation characteristics of the crumb with the help of ST-2 equipment” – Manual].
6. Shlelenko L.A., Tyurina O.E., and Nevskaya E.V. Features of technologies development of specialized bakery products.Bread products, 2014, no. 8, pp. 50–52. (In Russ.).
7. Erkinbaeva R., Kozyukina O., Goryunova N., and Movsarova Z. Vliyanie povysheniya biotekhnologicheskikh svoystv khlebopekarnykh pressovannykh drozhzhey na kachestvo khlebobulochnykh izdeliy [The effect of improving the biotechnological properties of pressed bakery yeast on the quality of bakery products]. Bread products, 2009, no. 9, pp. 52–53. (In Russ.).
8. Anikeeva N.V. Nauchnoe obosnovanie i razrabotka tekhnologiy khlebobulochnykh izdeliy funktsionalʹnogo znacheniya [Scientific substantiation and development of functional bakery products]. Bulletin of Altai State Agricultural University, 2012, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 77–81. (In Russ.).
9. Lebedenko T.E., Kaminskiy A.Ya., Shchelakova G.P., and Sokolova N.Yu. Sovremennye podkhody k vyboru sposoba prigotovleniya pshenichnogo testa [Modern approaches to the choice of the wheat dough preparation method]. Food Science and Technology, 2010, no. 1, pp. 46–52. (In Russ.).
10. Levashov R.R. and Mingaleeva Z.Sh. Issledovanie vliyaniya dobavki rastitelʹnogo proiskhozhdeniya na biotekhnologicheskie svoystva drozhzhey Saccharomyces cerevisiae [The effect of herbal supplements on the biotechnological properties of Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast]. Herald of Kazan Technological University, 2015, vol. 18, no. 18, pp. 268–269. (In Russ.).
11. Pashchenko L.P., Kolomnikova Ya.P., Pashchenko V.L., and Nikitin I.A. Development of rye white bread technology of a functional purpose for catering establishments. Bread products, 2012, no. 12, pp. 59–61. (In Russ.).
12. TR TS 021/2011. Tekhnicheskiy reglament Tamozhennogo soyuza “O bezopasnosti pishchevoy produktsii” [RP of the Customs Union 021/2011. Technical regulations of the Customs Union “On food safety”], 2011.
13. Aslankoohi E., Herrera-Malaver B., Rezaei M.N., et al. Non-Conventional Yeast Strains Increase the Aroma Complexity of Bread. PLoS ONE, 2016, vol. 11, no. 10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165126.
14. Struyf N., Van der Maelen E., Hemdane S., et al. Bread Dough and Baker’s Yeast: An Uplifting Synergy. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 2017, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 850–867. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1541- 4337.12282.
15. Dangi A.K., Dubey K.K., and Shukla P. Indian Strategies to Improve Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Technological Advancements and Evolutionary Engineering. Indian Journal of Microbiology, 2017, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 378–386. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1007/s12088-017-0679-8.
16. Tanaka F., Ando A., Nakamura T., Takagi H., and Shima J. Functional genomic analysis of commercial baker’s yeast during initial stages of model dough-fermentation. Food Microbiology, 2006, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 717–728. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.fm.2006.02.003
17. Heitmann M., Zannini E., and Arendt E.K. Impact of Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolites produced during fermentation on bread quality parameters: A review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 2018, vol. 58, no. 7, pp. 1152–1164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2016.1244153.
18. Salari R. and Salari R. Investigation of the Best Saccharomyces cerevisiae Growth Condition. Electronic Physician, 2017, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 3592–3597. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19082/3592.
19. Saranraj P., Sivasakthivelan P., and Suganthi K. Baker’s Yeast: Historical Development, Genetic Characteristics, Biochemistry, Fermentation and Downstream Processing. Journal of Academia and Industrial Research, 2017, vol. 6, pp. 111–119.
20. Takagi H. and Shima J. Stress Tolerance of Baker’s Yeast During Bread-Making Processes. In: Takagi H. and Kitagaki H. (eds) Stress Biology of Yeasts and Fungi. Tokyo: Springer Publ., 2015, pp. 23–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55248-2_2.