Abstract

The honey market offers a wide variety of brands and types. However, honey is a highly counterfeited product. Yet the features that affect consumer loyalty and preferences remain understudied. The article describes consumer preferences on the Crimean natural honey market and the most attractive honey products.
The research featured five samples of natural honey. The assessment involved digital technologies for data collecting and processing adapted to the technological processes on the consumer market.
The questionnaire method made it possible to identify the criteria that shape consumer preferences on the Russian and regional honey market, e.g., price, taste, trademarks, etc. Most respondents at least once purchased counterfeit honey. The selection criteria depended on the purpose, i.e., honey as food, as a therapeutic or prophylactic additive, as a cosmetic product, as a food ingredient, etc.
Based on the consumer tasting method, the honey of the Berestov A.S. brand had the best sensory profile. The pairwise correlation method revealed a strong connection between price and purpose, which made it possible to substantiate the factor effect on consumer choice.
A three-dimensional graphical profile of competitiveness included a consumer assessment of competitive advantages, a general assessment of the sensory profile, and a souvenir potential. The Crimean samples demonstrated a good sensory profile but a poor design and packaging, which limits consumer demand.
Crimean honey could get a competitive advantage if the local honey shifted to a differentiation strategy, promoting the local honey as a unique regional product, thus optimizing the supply and increasing the sales. The strategizing methods can be applied to a wide variety of food products.

Keywords

Honey, assortment, survey, consumer preferences, correlation, tasting, scoring, quality

REFERENCES

1. Smolentceva EV. Russian honey market in the regional aspect. Moscow Economic Journal. 2019;(5):177–185. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24411/2413-046X-2019-15020
2. Kozyaychev YuV. Compiling a portrait of honey consumers in the central federal district as a factor of successful development of private beekeeping farms in the conceptual system of relationship marketing. Innovation & Investment. 2022;(10):235–239. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/MODZUM
3. Mizhevikin DA, Eremina YuA, Mizhevikina AS. Consumer preferences for natural honey. Scientific Digital Archive. (In Russ.) Available from: http://econf.rae.ru/article/10342
4. Rozdolskaya IV, Grishkova NS, Yakovleva LR. Marketing study of honey buyers’ preferences (the Belgorod oblast honey market as a case study). Fundamental research. 2015;(7–1):193–201. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/UDXTZT
5. Alieva AK, Korotisheva LB, Prokopenko ST. Assessment of consumer properties of honey bee presented at retail St. Petersburg. Technical and technological issues in the sphere of service. 2013;(2):30–33. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/QJEUDR
6. Bavrina AP, Borisov IB. Modern rules of the application of correlation analysis. Medical Almanac. 2021;(3):70–79. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/TPSSIX
7. Gutnikova ON, Pavlunenko LE. Product tasting as a tool of organoleptic analysis in the quality management system of trading services. Information and economic aspects of standardization and technical regulation. 2021;(6):68–78. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/NPDBAR
8. Eliseev SL, Trapeznikova NN. Determining the quality of honey. Production quality control. 2019;(12):35–38. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/GJFVTX
9. Fedorinova ME. Comparative characteristics honey from different climate zones. Science Bulletin. 2021;1(2):189–195. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ZOTIHF
10. Semchenko MV, Zhuneva LS, Milenteva IS. Prospects of honey production and its use in food technology. Izvestiya Vuzov. Food Technology. 2019;(2–3):18–20. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/VVRGJL
11. Zimnyakov VM, Nevitov MN. Honey production in Russia. Innovative Machinery and Technology. 2023;10(3):50–55. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/PILSJY
12. Barysheva ES. Features physical and chemical indicators of quality of honey of various botanical and geographic origin. Achievements of modern natural science. 2016;(6):9–13. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/WBCPTP
13. Gutnikova ON, Pavlunenko LE, Tsekhla SY. Comprehensive approach to assessing the quality of trade services by its indicators: Proceedings II Intern. Applied Research Conf. Strategies and trends in organizational and project management, 2022;382–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94245-8
14. Biyazova ZB, Pavlunenko LE. Profile analysis in competitiveness evaluation. Marketing in the system of socio-economic development: Strategy and promotion. 2023;197–202. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/LWOZXR
15. Kazantseva EG, Lyamkin II. The Impact of value chains on food security. Food Processing: Techniques and Technology. 2022;52(2):282–295. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2074-9414-2022-2-2363
16. Shulyatieva GM. Improving the competitiveness of the med as a factor in the development of its production in terms of import. Aeconomics: economics and agriculture. 2017;(4):1. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/YLXRNL
17. Mizanbekova SK, Bogomolova IP, Vasilenko IN, Bogomolov AV. Strategic planning of innovation development of industrial enterprises under growing competition and risks. Food Processing: Techniques and Technology. 2019;49(1):144–158. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2074-9414-2019-1-144-158
18. Ivashov AV, Bykova TO, Sattarov VN, Mannapov AG. Assessment of melliferous and numerical potential of the population of honey bees in the Republic of Crimea. Beekeeping. 2017;(10):18–21. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/YMKBQS