Abstract

Introduction. National economies are looking for tools to activate the explicit and hidden resource potential. Innovative resource-saving projects are such a tool. Feed production strives to increase its resource efficiency.
Study objects and methods. The present research featured the feed industry of the Russian Federation and regional feed mills. It involved structural, functional, and systematic approaches and standard research methods.
Results and discussion. Liquid waste proved to be an important resource potential of modern feed production. It contains substances with high nutritional, biological, and energy value and can be used to produce methionine. The experimental part featured an industrial enterprise in the Voronezh region, which expects to produce 1452 tons of methionine worth 58 080 thousand rubles. The profitability will be 616.76%, the gross return on sales − 86.1%, the payback time – 1.44 months, the efficiency of capital investments – 8.45.
Conclusion. The innovative project will reduce the negative impact on the environment, increase the resource efficiency of the enterprise, and provide additional income.

Keywords

Compound feed production, resource saving, efficiency, import substitution, methionine, waste water, ecology

REFERENCES

1. Bolotova YuV. Agricultural supply management and market power: evidence from the U.S. dairy and potato industries. Agribusiness. 2016;32(4):563–568. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21485.
2. Zakshevskii VG, Bogomolova IP, Vasilenko IN. Managing the development of an industry enterprise based on the activation of the risk management mechanism. Ehkonomika, trud, upravlenie v selʹskom khozyaystve [Economy, labor, and management in agriculture]. 2020;58(1):3–9. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.33938/201-3.
3. Kostareva L. “Vitomeh”: novinki dlya raznykh otrasley zhivotnovodstva [“Vitome”: novelties for different branches of animal husbandry]. Kombikorma [Compound Feed]. 2020;(2):20–21. (In Russ.).
4. Pechenaya LT, Bogomolov AV, Vasilenko IN, Shatokhina NM. Prospects for the development of feed production in Russia on the basis of improving resource support. Storage and Processing of Farm Products. 2019;(3):8–19. (In Russ.).
5. Bogomolova IP, Kotarev AV, Prostenko AN, Dobrunova AI, Chugay DYu. Resource-saving waste-free production as an innovative method of improving enterprises' business performance in the meat production. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, and Applied Sciences and Technologies. 2019;10(12). https://doi.org/10.14456/ITJEMAST.2019.163.
6. Koppenberg M, Bozzola M, Dalhaus T, Hirsch S. Mapping potential implications of temporary COVID-19 export bans for the food supply in importing countries using precrisis trade flows. Agribusiness. 2021;37(1):25–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21684.
7. Vallejo-Cordoba B, Castro-López C, García HS, González-Córdova AF, Hernández-Mendoza A. Postbiotics and paraprobiotics: A review of current evidence and emerging trends. Advances in Food and Nutrition Research. 2020;94:1–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.afnr.2020.06.001.
8. Innovatsii v kombikormovoy otrasli [Innovations in the feed industry] [Internet]. [cited 2021 Mar 22]. Available from: https://ikonews.ru/industry/novyj-nedorogoj-istochnik.
9. Obzor kormovoy otrasli po itogam 2019 [Feed Industry Review-2019] [Internet]. [cited 2021 Mar 23]. Available from: https://www.dairynews.ru/news/rynok-kormov-itogi-2019-obzor-kormovoy-otrasli-po-.html.
10. Ehkspress-obzor rossiyskogo rynka kombikormov [Express review of the Russian market of compound feed] [Internet]. [cited 2021 Mar 25]. Available from: https://3dpro.info/site/reviews/russian-compound-feed-market-2020.
11. Federal State Statistics Service [Internet]. [cited 2021 Mar 24]. Available from: https://www.gks.ru.
12. Kotarev AV, Vasilenko IN, Kotareva AO, Dorofeev AF, Lebed VN. Modernization of the raw material base for the Russian meat production subcomplex in the conditions of improving the production innovativeness. Revista San Gregorio. 2019;(34):288–298.
13. Kühne B, Gellynck X, Weaver RD. Enhancing innovation capacity through vertical, horizontal, and third-party networks for traditional foods. Agribusiness. 2015;31(3):294–313. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21408.
14. Savintsev DI. Choosing a strategy of feed milling in the region: approaches and principles. Society: Politics, Economics, Law. 2018;(5):14–18. (In Russ.).
15. Syrovatka VI, Obukhov AD. Innovatsionnye tekhnologii proizvodstva kombikormov v khozyaystvakh [Innovative technologies for animal feed]. Vestnik Vserossiyskogo nauchno-issledovatelʹskogo instituta mekhanizatsii zhivotnovodstva [Bulletin of the All-Russian Research Institute of Livestock Mechanization]. 2017;1(1):74–77. (In Russ.).
16. Kotarev A. Analytical study of agribusiness as a tool for competitive development of the region in the context of globalization and integration risk. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2019;274(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/274/1/012035.
17. Krokhina VA, Kalashnikov AP, Fisinin VI, Smekalov NA, Khadanovich IV, Antonov AYa, et al. Kombikorma, kormovye dobavki i ZTSM dlya zhivotnykh: sostav i primenenie [Compound feed, feed additives, and milk replacer for animals: composition and application]. Moscow: Agropromizdat; 1990. 304 p. (In Russ.).
18. Bruschi V, Shershneva K, Dolgopolova I, Canavari M, Teuber R. Consumer perception of organic food in emerging markets: Evidence from Saint Petersburg, Russia. Agribusiness. 2015;31(3):414–432. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21414.
19. Mishurov NP, Voytyuk VA, Sypok SI. Management of export activities of agricultural enterprises using digital technology. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2021;723(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/723/3/032056.
20. Murphy B, Benson T, Lavelle F, Elliott C, Dean M. Assessing differences in levels of food trust between European countries. Food Control. 2021;120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107561.