Abstract

Introduction. New legume-based protein preparations are an excellent alternative to polymers of animal origin and can eliminate the protein deficiency in the diet of humans and animals. In this respect, the raw material base of common leguminous crops has to be thoroughly analyzed in order to develop new technological schemes for novel protein formulations. Study objects and methods. The present research compared modern trends in the production, properties, and safety of food and feed protein preparations based on peas and chickpeas. It involved such standard methods as data systematization and analysis of literary sources. Results and discussion. The leguminous agriculture in Russia is stable enough to produce food and feed protein preparations from peas and chickpeas with the maximum preservation of biological value, composition, and properties. Peas and chickpeas have a high biological value and are rich in polypeptides, fiber, minerals, vitamins, antioxidants, etc., which are lost during processing. By-products of protein production can be processed using biosynthetic transformation with various types of fungal and/or bacterial enzymes, as well as physical and/or physicochemical methods, to obtain feed or food products with an appropriate yield. A synthesis with enzymes or microorganisms can result in functional foods and feeds fortified with minerals, vitamins, fatty acids, and antioxidants.

Keywords

Legumes, protein preparations, production methods, functional properties, application, by-products

REFERENCES

1. Driving commitment for nutrition within the UN Decade of Action on Nutrition. World Health Organization and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2018. 12 p.
2. Singhal A, Karaca AC, Tyler R, Nickerson M. Pulse proteins: from processing to structure-function relationships. In: Goyal A, editor. Grain legumes. InTech; 2016. pp. 55–78. https://doi.org/10.5772/64020.
3. Eisner P, Weisz U, Osen R, Mittermaier S. Innovative foods. In: Neugebauer R, editor. Biological transformation. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Vieweg; 2019. pp. 39–65. (In Ger.). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58243-5_4.
4. Pruter T. Alternative crops for a traditional potato starch producer. 69th Starch Convention; 2018; Detmold. Detmold; 2018. p. 35.
5. Zotikov VI, Naumkina TS, Sidorenko VS, Gryadunova NV, Naumkin VV. Pulses as an important factor of sustainable ecologically oriented agriculture. Legumes and Groat Crops. 2016;17(1):6–13. (In Russ.).
6. Bondarenko AN. Effect of growth-stimulating preparations on productivity and economic efficiency of chickpea under the conditions of light chestnut saline soils of the Astrakhan oblast’. Agrarian Russia. 2019;(1):24–26. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30906/1999-5636-2019-1-24-26.
7. Singh A, Chahal HS. Organic grain legumes in India: potential production strategies, perspective, and relevance. In: Hasanuzzaman M, editor. Legume crops – prospects, production and uses. IntechOpen; 2020. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.93077.
8. Zotikov VI, Sidorenko VS, Gryadunova NV. Development of production of leguminous crops in the Russian Federation. Legumes and Groat Crops. 2018;26(2):4–10. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24411/2309-348X-2018-10008.
9. Posevnye ploshchadi, valovye sbory i urozhaynostʹ gorokha v Rossii. Itogi 2018 goda [Acreage, gross harvest, and yield of peas in Russia in 2018] [Internet]. [cited 2020 Dec 15]. Available from: https://www.agro-al.ru/novosti-otrasli/Posevnyeploshchadi-valovye-sbory-i-urozhaynost-gorokha-v-Rossii-Itogi-2018-goda.
10. Posevnye ploshchadi, valovye sbory i urozhaynostʹ nuta v Rossii. Itogi 2018 goda [Acreage, gross harvest, and yield of chickpeas in Russia in 2018] [Internet]. [cited 2020 Dec 15]. Available from: https://ab-centre.ru/news/posevnye-ploschadivalovye-sbory-i-urozhaynost-nuta-v-rossii-itogi-2018-goda.
11. Brailova IS, Filatova IA, Yuryeva NI, Belousova YuV. Evaluation of perspective pea varieties by quality and relationship of biochemical indicators with yield and weight of 1000 grains. Legumes and Groat Crops. 2020;35(3):20–25. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24411/2309-348x-2020-11180.
12. Ziyadov EhO, Oripov DM, Vafoeva MB. Pokazateli kachestva sortov i sortoobraztsov gorokha na bogare [Quality indicators of varieties and cultivars of peas on bogara]. Innovation Science. 2019;(10):23–26. (In Russ.).
13. Kulikov D, Kolpakova V, Slozhenkina M, Ulanova R, Chumikina L. Biotechnological process for producing protein products from chickpeas with a high biological value. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management. 2020;2020(6.1):175–181. https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2020/6.1/s25.023.
14. Ehnergeticheskie i belkovye potrebnosti: doklad Spetsialʹnogo obʺedinennogo komiteta ehkspertov FAO/VOZ [Energy and Protein Requirements: Report of the FAO/WHO Ad Hoc Joint Expert Committee]. Moscow: Meditsina; 1974. 143 p. (In Russ.).
15. Dietary protein quality evaluation in human nutrition: Report of an FAO Expert Consultation. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2013. 79 p.
16. Khabibulina NV, Krasnostanova AA, Aduchieva VD. Obtaining of purified albumin fraction from pea flour using flat membranes ultrafiltration. Apriori. Seriya: Estestvennye i tekhnicheskie nauki [Apriori. Series: Natural and Technical Sciences]. 2016;(1):1–10. (In Russ.).
17. Pankina IA, Borisova LM. Grain legumes’ swelling and solubility of their dry solids. Scientific Journal NRU ITMO. Processes and Food Production Equipment. 2016;(2):13–20. (In Russ.).
18. Roy F, Boye JI, Simpson BK. Bioactive proteins and peptides in pulse crops: Pea, chickpea and lentil. Food Research International. 2010;43(2):432–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2009.09.002.
19. Dhaliwal SK, Salaria P, Kaushik P. Pea seed proteins: a nutritional and nutraceutical update. In: Jimenez-Lopez JC, editor. Grain and seed proteins functionality. IntechOpen; 2021. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.95323.
20. Olagunju AI, Omoba OS, Enujiugha VN, Alashi AM, Aluko RE. Antioxidant properties, ACE/renin inhibitory activities of pigeon pea hydrolysates and effects on systolic blood pressure of spontaneously hypertensive rats. Food Science and Nutrition. 2018;6(7):1879–1889. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.740.
21. Gorecka D, Korezak J, Flaczyk E. Adsorption of bile acids and cholesterol by dry grain legume seeds. Polish Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences. 2003;12/53(1):69–73.
22. Serventi L, Vittadini E, Vodovotz Y. Effect of chickpea protein concentrate on the loaf quality of composite soy-wheat bread. LWT – Food Science and Technology. 2018;89:400–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2017.11.012.
23. Torres-Fuentes C, Contreras MDM, Recio I, Alaiz M, Vioque J. Identification and characterization of antioxidant peptides from chickpea protein hydrolysates. Food Chemistry. 2015;180:194–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.02.046.
24. Tian S, Kyle WSA, Small DM. Pilot scale isolation of proteins from field peas (Pisum sativum L.) for use as food ingredients. International Journal of Food Science and Technology. 1999;34(1):33–39. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2621.1999.00236.x.
25. Mondor M. Pea. In: Manickavasagan A, Thirunathan P, editors. Pulses. Cham: Springer; 2020. pp. 245–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41376-7_14.
26. Andreev NR, Kovalyonok VA, Nosovskay LP, Adikaeva LV, Goldstein VG. The study of the process of air classification of pea flour in a pilot plant. Storage and Processing of Farm Products. 2017;(11):43–48. (In Russ.).
27. Karaca AC. Modification of legume proteins for improved functionality. In: Jimenez-Lopez JC, editor. Grain and seed proteins functionality. IntechOpen; 2021. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.96274.
28. Pasupuleti VK, Braun S. State of the art manufacturing of protein hydrolysates. In: Pasupuleti VK, Demain AL, editors. Protein hydrolysates in biotechnology. Dordrecht: Springer; 2010. pp. 11–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6674-0_2.
29. Karaca AC, Low N, Nickerson M. Emulsifying properties of chickpea, faba bean, lentil and pea proteins produced by isoelectric precipitation and salt extraction. Food Research International. 2011;44(9):2742–2750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2011.06.012.
30. Brayden M, Xu L, Barbay G, Koros WJ. Impact of impurities on carbon molecular sieve membranes for application in olefins units. AIChE Ethylene Producers Conference Proceedings; 2017; San Antonio. San Antonio: American Institute of Chemical Engineers; 2017. p. 454–465.
31. Boye J, Zare F, Pletch A. Pulse proteins: Processing, characterization, functional properties and applications in food and feed. Food Research International. 2010;43(2):414–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2009.09.003.
32. Kolpakova VV, Martynova IV, Severinenko SM, Nechaev AP, Berman YuK. Belok iz pshenichnykh otrubey VI. Proektirovanie sbalansirovannogo sostava pishchevykh kompozitov belkovo-zhirovoy prirody [Wheat bran VI protein. Designing a balanced composition of protein-fat food composites]. Storage and Processing of Farm Products. 2001;(11):42–47. (In Russ.).
33. Kolpakova VV, Ulanova RV, Kulikov DS, Gulakova VA, Kadieva AT. Grain composites with a complementary amino acid composition in food and fodder. Food Processing: Techniques and Technology. 2019;49(2):301–311. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21603/2074-9414-2019-2-301-311.
34. Kolpakova V, Gaivoronskaya E, Gulakova V, Sardzhveladze A. Composition on the basis of plantbased proteins with the use of transgutaminase. 18 International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM: Conference proceedings; 2018; Albena. Albena: STEF92 Technology; 2018. p. 119–125. https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2018/6.2/S25.016.
35. Gaivoronskaya IS, Kolpakova VV. Creation of multicomponent protein compositions with increased biological value with the use of transglutaminase. Food Industry. 2019;(4):28–29. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24411/0235-2486-2019-10013.
36. Tontul İ, Kasimoglu Z, Asik S, Atbakan T, Topuz A. Functional properties of chickpea protein isolates dried by refractance window drying. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2018;109:1253–1259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.11.135.
37. Egorova EYu. “Nemolochnoe moloko”: obzor syrʹya i tekhnologiy [“Non-dairy milk”: an overview of raw materials and technologies]. Polzunovskiy Vestnik. 2018;(3):25–34. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25712/ASTU.2072-8921.2018.03.005.
38. Klost M, Drusch S. Structure formation and rheological properties of pea protein-based gels. Food Hydrocolloids. 2019;94:622–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.03.030.
39. Osen R, Schweiggert-Weisz U. High-moisture extrusion: meat analogues. Reference Module in Food Science. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100596-5.03099-7.
40. Lobanov VG, Slepokurova YuI, Zharkova IM, Koleva TNm Roslyakov YuF, Krasteva AP. Economic effect of innovative flour-based functional foods production. Foods and Raw Materials. 2018;6(2):474–482. https://doi.org/10.21603/2308-4057-2018-2-474-482.
41. Lam ACY, Can Karaca A, Tyler RT, Nickerson MT. Pea protein isolates: Structure, extraction, and functionality. Food Reviews International. 2018;34(2):126–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129.2016.1242135.
42. Assad-Bustillos M, Jonchère C, Garnier C, Réguerre AL, Della Valle G. Rheological and microstructural characterization of batters and sponge cakes fortified with pea proteins. Food Hydrocolloids. 2020;101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.105553.
43. Bajaj PR, Tang J, Sablani SS. Pea protein isolates: Novel wall materials for microencapsulating flaxseed oil. Food and Bioprocess Technology. 2015;8(12):2418–2428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-015-1589-6.
44. Kazantseva IL, Kulevatova TB, Zlobina LN. About of chickpea flour application in flour confectionery technology. Legumes and Groat Crops. 2018;25(1):76–81. (In Russ.).
45. Shrivastava C, Chakraborty S. Bread from wheat flour partially replaced by fermented chickpea flour: Optimizing the formulation and fuzzy analysis of sensory data. LWT – Food Science and Technology. 2018;90:215–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2017.12.019.
46. Miroshnik AS, Gorlov IF, Stozhenkina MI. Development of technology of functional chopped meat semi-finished product. Storage and Processing of Farm Products. 2017;(11):26–29. (In Russ.).
47. Garcia-Segovia P, Igual M, Noguerol AT, Martínez-Monzó J. Use of insects and pea powder as alternative protein and mineral sources in extruded snacks. European Food Research and Technology. 2020;246(4):703–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-020-03441-y.
48. Wee MSM, Loud DE, Tan VWK, Forde CG. Physical and sensory characterisation of noodles with added native and denatured pea protein isolate. Food Chemistry. 2019;294:152–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.05.042.
49. Ben-Harb S, Saint-Eve A, Panouillé M, Souchon I, Bonnarme P, Dugat-Bony E, et al. Design of microbial consortia for the fermentation of pea-protein-enriched emulsions. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2019;293:124–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2019.01.012.
50. Xu JC, Zhang M, He T, Luo H, Peng K, Huang X, et al. Application of de-lignified cellulose to enhance intracellular and extracellular lipid production from oleaginous yeast using acetic acid. Bioresource Technology. 2019;293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122032.
51. Sarris D, Sampani Z, Rapti A, Papanikolaou S. Valorization of crude glycerol, residue deriving from biodiesel- production process, with the use of wild-type new isolated Yarrowia lipolytica strains: Production of Metabolites with Pharmaceutical and Biotechnological Interest. Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology. 2019;20(10):881–894. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389201020666190211145215.
52. Machado WRM, Silva LG, Vanzela ESL, Del Bianchi VL. Production of carotenoids by Rhodotorula toruloides isolated from Brazilian tropical savannah. International Food Research Journal. 2019;26(4):1259–1267.
53. Zhou XL, Ouyang Z, Zhang X, Wei Y, Tang S, Ma Z, et al. Sweet corn stalk treated with saccharomyces cerevisiae alone or in combination with Lactobacillus plantarum: Nutritional composition, fermentation traits and aerobic stability. Animals. 2019;9(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9090598.
54. Bampidis V, Azimonti G, de Lourdes Bastos M, Christensen H, Dusemund B, Kouba M, et al. Efficacy of Saccharomyces cerevisiae NBRC 0203, Lactobacillus plantarum NBRC 3070 and Lactobacillus casei NBRC 3425 as a technological additive (silage additive) for all animal species. EFSA Journal. 2019;17(4). https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5700.
55. Sun Z, Wang T, Aschalew ND, Zhao W, Chen X, Zhang X-F, et al. Effects of yeast cultures with different fermentation times on the growth performance, caecal microbial community and metabolite profile of broilers. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition. 2020;104(1):212–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.13241.
56. Zhen YG, Zhao W, Chen X, Li LJ, Lee HG, Zhang XF, et al. Effects of yeast culture on broiler growth performance, nutrient digestibility and caecal microbiota. South African Journal of Animal Science. 2019;49(1):99–108. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v49i1.12.
57. Sousa DO, Oliveira CA, Velasquez AV, Souza JM, Chevaux E, Mari LJ, et al. Live yeast supplementation improves rumen fibre degradation in cattle grazing tropical pastures throughout the year. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2018;236:149–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.12.015.
58. Anjum MI, Javaid S, Ansar MS, Ghaffar A. Effects of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) supplementation on intake, digestibility, rumen fermentation and milk yield in Nili-Ravi buffaloes. Iranian Journal of Veterinary Research. 2018;19(2):96–100. https://doi.org/10.22099/IJVR.2018.4852.
59. Shakira G, Qubtia M, Ahmed I, Hasan F, Anjum MI, Imran M. Effect of indigenously isolated Saccharomyces cerevisiae probiotics on milk production, nutrient digestibility, blood chemistry and fecal microbiota in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences. 2018;28(2):407–420.
60. Sallam SMA, Abdelmalek MLR, Kholif AE, Zahran SM, Ahmed MH, Zeweil HS, et al. The effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae live cells and Aspergillus oryzae fermentation extract on the lactational performance of dairy cows. Animal Biotechnology. 2020;31(6):491–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495398.2019.1625783.
61. Bashashkina EV, Pashinina EA, Pashinin AE, Suyasov NA. Kofeynyy shlam kak syrʹe dlya polucheniya kormovoy dobavki [Coffee sludge as a raw material for a feed additive]. Uspekhi khimii i khimicheskoy tekhnologii [Advances in chemistry and chemical technology]. 2008;22(13)(93):38–40. (In Russ.).
62. Serba EM, Sokolova EN, Fursova NA, Volkova GS, Borshheva YuA, Kurbatova EI, et al. Obtaining biologically active additives based on enriched yeast biomass. Storage and Processing of Farm Products. 2018;(2):74–79. (In Russ.).
63. Kot AM, Błażejak S, Kieliszek M, Gientka I, Bryś J, Reczek L, et al. Effect of exogenous stress factors on the biosynthesis of carotenoids and lipids by Rhodotorula yeast strains in media containing agroindustrial waste. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2019;35(10). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-019-2732-8.
64. ChuppaTostain G, Hoarau J, Watson M, Adelard L, Sing ASC, Caro Y, et al. Production of Aspergillus niger biomass on sugarcane distillery wastewater: physiological aspects and potential for biodiesel production. Fungal Biology and Biotechnology. 2018;5(1):6–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40694-018-0045-6.
65. Karetkin BA, Panfilov VI, Panfilova EV, Khromova NY, Shakir IV. Heterogeneous submerged fermentation of a probiotic in media based on wheat flour and by-products of wheat starch production. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management. 2017;17(61):711–718. https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2017/61/S25.093.
66. Souza Filho PF, Nair RB, Andersson D, Lennartsson PR, Taherzadeh MJ. Veganmycoprotein concentrate from peaprocessing industry byproduct using edible filamentous fungi. Fungal Biology and Biotechnology. 2018;5(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40694-018-0050-9.